> / General Forums > / Poetry & Poets

/ Poetry & Poets ... ..

 
LinkBack
  #1  
11-19-2010, 08:11 AM
RSS RSS

ViP

 
: Mar 2010
: 24,972
: 75
RSS has much to be proud ofRSS has much to be proud ofRSS has much to be proud ofRSS has much to be proud ofRSS has much to be proud ofRSS has much to be proud ofRSS has much to be proud ofRSS has much to be proud ofRSS has much to be proud ofRSS has much to be proud ofRSS has much to be proud of
How the Fed and the Treasury Stonewalled Mark Pittman to His Dying Breath

The Banksters, the Feds and the Emasculation of FOIA *How the Fed and the Treasury Stonewalled Mark Pittman to His Dying Breath* By PAM...

The Banksters, the Feds and the Emasculation of FOIA


How the Fed and the Treasury Stonewalled Mark Pittman to His Dying Breath

By PAM MARTENS

On the Presidents first day in office on January 21, 2009, he issued an Open Government memo promising the American people a new era of transparency. On March 19, 2009, under the Presidents orders, the Attorney Generals office issued detailed guidelines on how Federal agencies were to respond going forward to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. The guidelines instructed the agencies as follows:

The key frame of reference for this new mind set is the purpose behind the FOIA. The statute is designed to open agency activity to the light of day. As the Supreme Court has declared: FOIA is often explained as a means for citizens to know what their Government is up to.' NARA v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157, 171 (2004) (quoting U.S. Dep't of Justice v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749, 773 (1989)The Presidents FOIA Memoranda directly links transparency with accountability which, in turn, is a requirement of a democracy. The President recognized the FOIA as the most prominent expression of a profound national commitment to ensuring open Government. Agency personnel, therefore, should keep the purpose of the FOIA -- ensuring an open Government -- foremost in their mind.

It pains me to inform you, Mr. President, but the Treasury Department, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, and Securities and Exchange Commission (the trio that has been variously distracted minting trillions in currency, trading cash for trash with Wall Street, surfing for porn, or mishandling multiple voluminous tips on Bernie Madoffs Ponzi scheme) have misplaced your memo or, as many suspect, take their marching orders not from you but from Wall Street -- perhaps because they perceive that this is where you take your orders too.

On October 6, 2010, I filed three FOIA requests with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). I had come by information that the official government report on the stock markets Flash Crash of May 6, 2010 was materially wrong and I wanted to buttress my investigative report to the public with documents the SEC had obtained or compiled in conducting its investigation.

I followed the SECs FOIA instructions and emailed the requests to foiapa@sec.gov as instructed by the web site, asking for a small amount of very specific information. (You should know, Mr. President, that you may need a technology overhaul, along with a personnel overhaul at the SEC because, according to their written response, it took six days to receive my email. The SEC emailed me as follows on October 12: This letter is an acknowledgment of your FOIA Request dated October 06, 2010, and received in this office on October 12, 2010, regarding Flash Crash of May 06 A cynical person might entertain the idea that this is a standard response to postal requests and the SEC didnt notice that my request came in via email.)

According to Congress, the SEC was required, under the 1996 amendments to the FOIA,

to determine within 20 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays) after the receipt of a request whether to comply with the request. The actual disclosure of documents is required to follow promptly thereafter. If a request is denied in whole or in part, the agency must tell the requester the reasons for the denial. The agency must also tell the requester that there is a right to appeal any adverse determination to the head of the agency or his or her designee. The FOIA permits an agency to extend the time limits up to 10 days in unusual circumstances. These circumstances include the need to collect records from remote locations, review large numbers of records, and consult with other agencies. The agency is supposed to notify the requester whenever an extension is invoked.

My response was not answered within 20 business days and I was not informed it would be delayed. On the 24th business day, I was informed by three separate emails that all three of my requests were denied in their entirety. In reviewing the transmission detail on each email, it took seconds for the SECs outgoing emails to reach me, whereas the SEC would have me believe that their incoming emails take six days.

One request was denied on the basis of FOIA exemption number 8. Congress defines that exemption as follows: The eighth exemption protects information that is contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by or for a bank supervisory agency such as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve, or similar agencies. The SEC supervises and regulates broker-dealers and securities trading, not banks. Moreover, I was seeking documents related to a specific stock market event, the Flash Crash of May 6, 2010, not a report or examination of a banks condition.

The second request was denied on the basis of FOIA exemption number 5. Congress defines that exemption as applying to internal government documents.

An example is a letter from one government department to another about a joint decision that has not yet been made. Another example is a memorandum from an agency employee to his supervisor
describing options for conducting the agencys business. The purpose of the fifth exemption is to safeguard the deliberative policymaking process of governmentFor example, the exemption protects the policymaking process, but it does not protect purely factual informationProtection for the decision making process is appropriate only for the period while decisions are being made. Thus, the fifth exemption has been held to distinguish between documents that are pre-decisional and therefore may be protected, and those which are post-decisional and therefore not subject to protection.

My request was for factual information and not policy deliberations. Since the official report on the May 6, 2010 Flash Crash was released on October 1, 2010 and my request was made on October 6, 2010, all documents sought would have been post-decisional and not subject to protection.

My third request was denied on the basis that the SEC did not have the information but their letter referenced only half the information I sought and was silent on the other half.

A brief flash of a movie scene came to mind as I reflected on the governments maniacal refusals to turn over Wall Street documents since the financial crisis began. In The Rainmaker, based on the John Grisham novel, young Donny Ray dies of leukemia because the evil insurance company, Great Benefit, wont approve a bone marrow transplant. After repeatedly denying the mothers treatment requests for her Dying son, the company sends her a final denial letter calling her stupid, stupid, stupid for failing to just go away. As it turns out, wearing the requester down with denials is a formalized practice for corporate benefit; there is no Great Benefit ever intended for the public.

The movie flashback reminded me of Mark Pittmans FOIA battle. Pittman was a revered and trusted Bloomberg News financial reporter who died on November 25, 2009 at age 52 after his government essentially told him they thought he was stupid, stupid, stupid for not just going away. The government Stonewalled him to his last breath.

Pittmans legacy is now memorialized in Bloomberg v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System which was decided in Bloombergs favor by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on March 19, 2010. Pittman had asked the Federal Reserve Board, under a FOIA request in April and May of 2008, for details of four lending programs, including the borrowers names and the amounts borrowed. The programs were the Discount Window, the Primary Dealer Credit Facility, the Term Securities Lending Facility, and the Term Auction Facility. Pittmans curiosity was piqued by the astronomical amount of borrowing taking place at the Fed by Wall Street banks during the crisis in 2008. After averaging approximately $250 million a week in prior years, lending at the Feds Discount Window spiraled to over $100 billion in October 2008.

By law, the Federal Reserve had 20 business days to make a determination on the FOIA request. Instead, according to the Bloomberg lawsuit: On June 19, 2008, the Fed invoked its right to extend the response time to July 3, 2008. On July 8, 2008, the Fed called Bloomberg News to say it was processing the request. The Fed called Bloomberg again on August 15, 2008, wherein Alison Thro, Senior Counsel and another employee, Pam Wilson, informed the business wire service that their request was going to be denied by the end of September 2008. No further communication came, including the denial.

On November 7, 2008, Bloomberg News filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, charging that: the Fed has vastly expanded its lending programs to private financial institutions. To obtain access to this public money and to safeguard the taxpayers interests, borrowers are required to post collateral. Despite the manifest public interest in such matters, however, none of the programs themselves make reference to any public disclosure of the posted collateral or of the Feds methods in valuing it. Thus, while the taxpayers are the ultimate counterparty for the collateral, they have not been given any information regarding the kind of collateral received, how it was valued, or by whom.

Its now two years later, Bloomberg has won at both the U.S. District Court and the Second Circuit Appeals Court and the information is still being withheld. While the Federal Reserve Board is not appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court, many of the same Wall Street banks the taxpayers bailed out, including Bank of America, JPMorganChase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo, are appealing to stop the release of the information through a consortium called The Clearing House Association LLC. At least one person doesnt believe that appeal presents a solid basis to withhold the information. Matthew Winkler, Editor in Chief at Bloomberg News, wrote in an October 28, 2010 OpEd in the Wall Street Journal: Now that the Fed is no longer pursuing the case, it may be able to release the information Bloomberg seeks at any time. We call on it to do so.

Pittmans battle with the Fed has been widely publicized. Less known is the specious handling of his FOIA request by the U.S. Treasury.

On Jan. 28, 2009, Pittman filed a FOIA with the U.S. Treasury asking it to identify the $301 billion in securities owned by Citigroup that the government had agreed to guarantee to help shore up the troubled bank and to provide details of any contracts the Treasury had with outside firms hired to calculate the assets values. Pittman died 10 months later still waiting for a response.

According to a Bloomberg News story reported by Bob Ivry on October 25th of this year, it took the Treasury over 20 months to finally respond, after allowing Citigroup to have input in what was to be disclosed. Treasury officials responded with 560 pages of printed-out e-mails -- none of which Pittman requested. They were so heavily redacted that most of whats left are everyday messages such as Did you just try to call me? None of the documents answers Pittmans request for records sufficient to show the names of the relevant securities or the dates and terms of the guarantees. The headline of the article read Treasury Shielding Citigroup With FOIA Deletions. A subhead might have been Citigroup Calls the Shots at Treasury.

What does Winkler (and this writer) think the withheld facts might show? In Winklers OpEd of October 28 he noted: Such disclosure would show whether the central bank may have violated the law by lending to any insolvent banks for extended periods.

Did Pittman have any particular bank in mind when he filed his FOIAs? Well, he did want to know about that $301 billion guarantee to Citigroup.

I commend Pittman and Winkler for not just going away and I share their concerns. In my CounterPunch column of November 24, 2008, titled The Rise and Fall of Citigroup, I noted that

As of last Fridays close, Citigroup had $2 trillion in assets and $20.5 billion in stock market value, strongly suggesting the term assets is a misnomer on Wall Street. Late last night the U.S. government agreed to dump hundreds of billions more into this black hole without any survival plan required of the company as demanded of the auto makers: apparently if you make those four wheel machines that get us to work youre suspect; if you manufacture losses in unintelligible derivatives, youre good to go[Citigroups] stock lost 60 per cent last week and 87 per cent this year. The companys market value has now fallen from more than $250 billion in 2006 to $20.5 billion on Friday, November 21, 2008.

At that point in time, Citigroups market value was $4.5 billion less than the company owed taxpayers from the U.S. Treasurys bailout program.

Pam Martens worked on Wall Street for 21 years; she has no security position, long or short, in any company mentioned in this article. She writes on public interest issues from New Hampshire. She can be reached at pamk741@aol.com

http://www.counterpunch.com/martens11162010.html


: http://www.alkrsan.net/forum/caoun-ae-caounca-poetry-and-poets/31768-how-the-fed-and-the-treasury-stonewalled-mark-pittman-to-his-dying-breath.html
The Banksters, the Feds and the Emasculation of FOIA *How the Fed and the Treasury Stonewalled Mark Pittman to His Dying Breath* By PAM MARTENS On the Presidents first day in office on January 21, 2009, he issued an Open Government memo promising the American people a new era of...

How the Fed and Treasury Stonewalled Mark Pittman to His Dying Breath
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!


« | »

: 1 (0 1 )
 



GMT +3. 12:41 PM.

- - -


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1

-

alkrsan 2006-2014


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516